Steve,

I like hte helter-skelter idea. HTat way Iget to see stamps that i might
not otherwise. Heck, how often do I get out to the Pacific Coast? OR the
Atlantic Coast for htat matter? I am much more likely to see local stamps.

My opinion, lol.
Mama Stork
aka Pam in Cinci

The first is to send to box of, helter skelter across country by the order
of the receipt of the request to be placed on the list. In other words, I
create the list of names, in the order that I received the request which
means the box could go from one coast to the other coast, back and forth.

The second is to group the names together by state and start in one area of
the country and send it off to that 'state' to each person residing in that
state, one after the other, then on to the next state, to each person in
that state, one after the other, and so on.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I was thinking that grouping by state would cut down on postage and
hopefully get it through the entire group faster. Less time "in transit"?
But In the end, I'm ok either way.
Raindear

-----Original Message-----
From: Rayvenhaus [mailto:rayvenhaus@myndworx.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 11:54 AM
To: LBNA
Cc: NALB [NewAgeLetterboxing]
Subject: [LbNA] [Aztec Gold] A question, if I may.............

I've got a question concerning the Aztec Gold PLB that I'll be sending out
in December...

The response have been fantastic and I have put the names into the database,
getting everything ready to go... I've not received any responses requesting
the peoples trail names not be associated with a state. In that vein,
please, if you do not want the state indicated on the interactive map
tracking the progress of this PLB, please, please send me an email, offlist
at XrayvenhausX@XmyndworxX.XcomX (Remove the 'X's from that address) and let
me know before Dec 1st, 2003.

Now, off to the question........ What do you folks think of these two
possibilities?

The first is to send to box of, helter skelter across country by the order
of the receipt of the request to be placed on the list. In other words, I
create the list of names, in the order that I received the request which
means the box could go from one coast to the other coast, back and forth.

The second is to group the names together by state and start in one area of
the country and send it off to that 'state' to each person residing in that
state, one after the other, then on to the next state, to each person in
that state, one after the other, and so on.

I'm building the list now and adding the finishing touches to the box and
getting everything ready to ship, creating the logbook and making a
permanent shipping box for the letterbox to be housed in so that all anyone
has to do it rewrap it in, plain paper or whatever, address it and send it
off.

Let me know which way you think it should be sent out!

I look forward to your response.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Steve of Rayvenhaus
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati", "Vincit Qui Patitur"
NLC Website - http://www.myndworx.com
(Rayvenhaus PFX - http://www.myndworx.com/rayvenhaus
)
"We leave nothing but an image to mark our passage."
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


ADVERTISEMENT

web/S=1705065786:HM/EXP=1069866790/A=1853618/R=0/*http:/www.netflix.com/Defa
ult?mqso=60178338&partid=4116730> click here


l/S=:HM/A=1853618/rand=431696256>

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I like the idea of it criss crossing the counrty. We already see the sig
stamps of those around us and it will be neat to see folk from all over whom we
would not get to meet in person. And, if it shows up in my area I'll let my
friends know who are not on the list that is has arrived. I'm good at sharing!
BookWorm, who expects this box to arrive when there is too much snow on the
ground to dig boxes from it this winter and will be SO HAPPY to see it arrive!


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I think it would be most fair to send it helter skelter (she's coming
down fast, yes she is). If you grouped by state, it would take
forever to get to the last state on the list. Not fair for those who
responded early but who live in a state low on the list.

my humble opinion,
Nailhead, yeah yeah yeah.


>
> Let me know which way you think it should be sent out!
>
> I look forward to your response.
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Steve of Rayvenhaus
>

I agree. first come first served.
STAR:W+S=DRR


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I believe first come first served. So my vote is to place the mailing list
in order of first sign in first get. Heltiskeler is my choice.

STAR:W+S=DRR



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Quoting Rayvenhaus :
What do you folks think of these two
> possibilities?
>
We agree with the helter skelter approach - fairer to those who signed up first,
and a more interesting log book for those who signed up last. (like us)
gg
___________________________________________________________
This mail sent using ToadMail -- Web based e-mail @ ToadNet